EXPECTATIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR AI-ENABLED SYSTEMS APPLICATION IN THE CONTEXT OF MILITARY COMMUNICATIONS AND CYBERSECURITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.68302/std2026.vol1.75Keywords:
artificial intelligence, command and control (C2), cybersecurity, military communicationsAbstract
The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming military communications and cybersecurity by enabling higher levels of automation, adaptability, and data-driven decision-making. This paper examines the role of AI-enabled systems in military communication environments, with a focus on emerging operational trends, system requirements, and potential application areas. Particular attention is given to the effects of communication disruptions on mission effectiveness and to the growing need for resilient, secure, and interoperable communication infrastructures. The paper also outlines conceptual examples of AI-enabled military communication systems that can optimise network performance, prioritise critical data transmission, and strengthen cybersecurity through improved threat detection and response. The analysis shows that AI can significantly enhance situational awareness and real-time operational responsiveness, while also introducing new dependencies and implementation challenges. The study highlights the importance of adaptive system design and effective human-AI collaboration for the secure and reliable use of AI in military communications.
Supporting Agencies
The work in this paper has received funding from the European Union – European Defence Fund under GA no. 101103385 (AInception). Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union. The European Union cannot be held responsible for them.Downloads
References
[1] S. Prasad, D. Behl, J. Raju, and T. Lewis, “Building AI-driven closed-loop automation systems,” IBM Developer, [Online]. Available: https://developer.ibm.com/articles/an-introduction-to-closed-loop-automation/ .
[2] Thales Group, “Tactical networks,” [Online]. Available: https://www.thalesgroup.com/en/markets/defence-and-security/mission-critical-communications/tactical-networks .
[3] General Dynamics Mission Systems, “Warfighter Information Network-Tactical (WIN-T),” [Online]. Available: https://gdmissionsystems.com/communications/warfighter-information-network-tactical .
[4] L. M. Blaha, “Interactive OODA Processes for Operational Joint Human-Machine Intelligence,” in STO-MP-IST-160, pp. 3–18.
[5] A. S. Peng, D. M. Moen, T. He, and D. J. Lilja, “Automatic Dynamic Resource Management Architecture in Tactical Network Environments.”
[6] R. Fronteddu et al., “State Estimation for Tactical Networks: Challenges and Approaches,” in MILCOM 2018, pp. 1042–1048, doi:10.1109/MILCOM.2018.8599823.
[7] VMware, “SD-WAN Dynamic Multipath Optimization,” [Online]. Available: https://kb.vmware.com/s/article/2733094 .
[8] C. Gedo et al., “GIG QoS Inter-Domain Interoperability Challenges,” in MILCOM 2007, doi:10.1109/MILCOM.2007.4455023.
[9] AInception Project, “Project overview,” [Online]. Available: https://www.ainception.eu/overview .
[10] S. Russell and P. Norvig, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 4th ed., Pearson, 2021.
[11] NATO STO, “Artificial Intelligence and Autonomy in Defence,” Science & Technology Organization, 2020.
[12] P. Scharre, Army of None: Autonomous Weapons and the Future of War, W. W. Norton & Company, 2018.
[13] M. Lewis et al., “Human–Machine Teaming for Military Decision Making,” IEEE Computer, vol. 51, no. 12, pp. 38–45, 2018.
[14] ENISA, “Artificial Intelligence Cybersecurity Challenges,” European Union Agency for Cybersecurity, 2021.
[15] J. Kott and C. Arnold, “The Promises and Challenges of AI for Military Decision-Making,” Military Operations Research, 2019.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Angel Genchev, Emil Ivanov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
