EFFICIENT AND TRUSTWORTHY ANTI-CORRUPTION AI: LEVERAGING MODEL PRUNING FOR SECURE DEPLOYMENT IN CRITICAL SYSTEMS

Authors

  • Tamara Ristovska Computer Science University of Library Studies and Information Technologies, Sofia, Bulgaria https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9870-1327
  • Lyubomir Gotsev Computer Science University of Library Studies and Information Technologies, Sofia, Bulgaria https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5217-5780
  • Genadiy Gospodinov Computer Science University of Library Studies and Information Technologies, Sofia, Bulgaria
  • Jordan Deliversky National Security University of Library Studies and Information Technologies, Sofia, Bulgaria https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7799-1461
  • Stanislava Cholova Public Communications University of Library Studies and Information Technologies, Sofia, Bulgaria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.68302/std2026.vol1.167

Keywords:

anti-corruption AI, machine learning, model pruning, procurement anomaly detection

Abstract

Corruption in public procurement, financial transactions, and administrative processes presents substantial threats to national and international security, compromising integrity in defense logistics, resource distribution, and governance frameworks. Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning models for anomaly detection, fraud identification, and risk prediction, has emerged as a powerful analytical tool for procurement risk monitoring. However, large-scale AI models face significant barriers to deployment in secure, resource-constrained environments such as edge devices used for military or public-sector monitoring. These barriers include high computational demands, susceptibility to adversarial perturbations, and limited interpretability — all of which reduce their suitability for security-critical applications.
This study examines model pruning techniques, including structured and unstructured pruning as well as magnitude-based and lottery ticket hypothesis-inspired approaches, to create compact and efficient anti-corruption AI models with minimal accuracy degradation. These pruned models achieve faster inference and substantially reduced memory footprints, enabling deployment on edge devices and in resource-constrained secure environments. Experimental results demonstrate effective identification of key procurement risk signals, including single-bid awards, suspiciously short tender windows, and irregular fund flows. The proposed approach offers a pathway for integrating compact, efficient procurement anomaly detection models into defense and security technologies, supporting decision support systems and infrastructure protection. This work bridges advances in artificial intelligence with secure technology development, contributing to enhanced societal integrity and resilience.

Supporting Agencies

The present paper was prepared as a result of the scientific research activities conducted within scientific project “Research on the possibilities of preventing corruption activities” financed by the Bulgarian National Science Fund at the Ministry of Education and Science, “Competition for financial support of basic research projects – 2025”, Contract № КП-06-Н95/7 by 09.12.2025

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Transparency International Defence & Security, “Governance First: Tackling Corruption Risks Amid Rising Defence Spending,” Transparency International Defence & Security, Apr. 2026. [Online].Available:https://ti-defence.org/publications/governance-first-tackling-corruption-risks-amid-rising-defence-spending/

[2] Transparency International US and Transparency International Defence & Security, “Blissfully Blind: The New US Push for Defense Industrial Collaboration with Partner Countries and its Corruption Risks,” Transparency International, Apr. 2024. [Online].Available:https://us.transparency.org/app/uploads/2024/04/Blissfully-Blind-US-Push-for-Defense-Industrial-Collaboration-WEB-New-1.pdf

[3] Transparency International Defence & Security, “Trojan Horse Tactics: Corruption Risk in Defence Spending,” Transparency International Defence & Security, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ti-defence.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Trojan-Horse-Tactics-corruption-risk-in-defence-spending.pdf

[4] Transparency International, “Corruption Perceptions Index 2025,” Transparency International, Feb. 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2025

[5] M. Resimić, “Harnessing artificial intelligence (AI) for anti-corruption,” Transparency International Knowledge Hub, Oct. 2025.[Online].Available:https://knowledgehub.transparencycdn.org/kproducts/Harnessing-artificial-intelligence-for-anti-corruption_01.10.2025.pdf

[6] T. Zatonatska, O. Dluhopolskyi, O. Artiushenko, I. C. Lopes, A. Ignatyuk, and O. Liubkina, “Comparative analysis of ensemble machine learning models for risk-oriented monitoring of military procurement,” Journal of Risk and Financial Management, vol. 19, no. 3, p. 170, 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm19030170.

[7] C. Cernăzanu-Glăvan and A.-Ș. Bulzan, “Explainable AI and fuzzy linguistic interpretation for enhanced transparency in public procurement: Analyzing EU tender awards,” Mathematics, vol. 13, no. 13, p. 2215, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/math13132215.

[8] OECD (2025), Governing with Artificial Intelligence: The State of Play and Way Forward in Core Government Functions, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/795de142-en.

[9] G. Piras, M. Pintor, A. Demontis, B. Biggio, G. Giacinto, and F. Roli, “Adversarial pruning: A survey and benchmark of pruning methods for adversarial robustness,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 168, p. 111788, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2025.111788.

[10] A. Douzandeh Zenoozi, L. Erhan, A. Liotta, and L. Cavallaro, “A comparative study of neural network pruning strategies for industrial applications,” Frontiers in Computer Science, vol. 7, p. 1563942, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2025.1563942.

[11] J. Frankle and M. Carbin, “The lottery ticket hypothesis: Finding sparse, trainable neural networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.03635, 2018.

[12] P. Austria et al., “The effects of compounded reductions on adversarial robustness (pruning and robustness),” OSTI, 2025. Available: https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/3002675.

[13] E. Schneider dos Santos, M. Machado dos Santos, M. Castro et al., “Detection of fraud in public procurement using data-driven methods: a systematic mapping study,” EPJ Data Science, vol. 14, p. 52, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-025-00569-3

[14] L. Potin, R. Figueiredo, V. Labatut, and C. Largeron, “Pattern mining for anomaly detection in graphs: Application to fraud in public procurement,” in Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases: Applied Data Science and Demo Track (ECML PKDD 2023), G. D. F. Morales et al., Eds. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 14174. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2023, pp. 1–? doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43427-3_5.

[15] U. U. Acikalin, M. K. Gorgun, M. Kutlu, and B. K. O. Tas, “How you describe procurement calls matters: Predicting outcome of public procurement using call descriptions,” Natural Language Engineering, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1255–1276, 2024. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S135132492300030X

[16] B. Liu et al., “A Survey of Lottery Ticket Hypothesis,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.04861, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.04861

[17] R. Bluteau, R. Gras, and G. Peralta, “Genetic-based lottery ticket pruning for transformers in sentiment classification: Realized through lottery sample selection,” Algorithms, vol. 18, no. 12, p. 798, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/a18120798.

[18] OECD, Digital Transformation of Public Procurement, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2025. Available: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2025/06/digital-transformation-of-public-procurement_90ace30d/79651651-en.pdf.

[19] OECD, “AI in fighting corruption and promoting public integrity,” in Governing with Artificial Intelligence, OECD Publishing, Sep. 2025.[Online].Available:https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/governing-with-artificial-intelligence_795de142-en/full-report/ai-in-fighting-corruption-and-promoting-public-integrity_60f5c50a.html

[20] Transparency International Defence & Security, “The Trust Gap: How Public Trust Links to Defence Spending,” Transparency International Defence & Security, Mar. 2026. [Online]. Available: https://ti-defence.org/the-trust-gap-how-public-trust-links-to-defence-spending/

Downloads

Published

17.09.2026

How to Cite

[1]
T. Ristovska, L. Gotsev, G. Gospodinov, J. Deliversky, and S. Cholova, “EFFICIENT AND TRUSTWORTHY ANTI-CORRUPTION AI: LEVERAGING MODEL PRUNING FOR SECURE DEPLOYMENT IN CRITICAL SYSTEMS”, SysTechDev, vol. 1, pp. 417–423, Sep. 2026, doi: 10.68302/std2026.vol1.167.