THE HYBRID WARFARE IN CYBERSPACE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.68302/std2026.vol1.131Keywords:
cyberspace, domain, hybrid warfare, strategic approachesAbstract
After cyberspace built its own individual image and after the opinions that this new space has potential to be a war domain, the question about opportunities for undertaking hybrid warfare in it is gaining relevance. The present study is looking for the characteristics of this type of hybrid warfare and their relations with technological sovereignty in the field of national security. This construction defines cyberspace as the object and the hybrid warfare as the subject of this study. The aim of the research is to explain the vectors of warfare in the framework of hybrid challenges that stand before states, as well as to make visible the difference in the methods of hybrid warfare. Through a multidisciplinary analysis discovered, described and arranged are different approaches, with which developed countries like China, the USA, Russia and the United Kingdom react against challenges, such as the hardware and software dependency on the cyberspace in the context of politics, economics and defence.
Downloads
References
[1] M. Castells, The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell Publishers, 1996.
[2] M. Castells, The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 2001.
[3] F. G. Hoffman, Conflict in the 21st Century: The Rise of Hybrid Wars. Arlington, VA, USA: Potomac Institute for Policy Studies, 2007.
[4] North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), “Wales Summit Declaration,” Brussels, Belgium, 2014.
[5] North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), “Warsaw Summit Communiqué,” Brussels, Belgium, 2016.
[6] T. Thomas, Recasting the Red Star: Russia Forges Tradition and Technology Through Toughness. Fort Leavenworth, KS, USA: Foreign Military Studies Office, 2011.
[7] P. Atanasov, Sigurnost i komunikirane na informatsiya v publichnostta. Plovdiv, Bulgaria: Makros, 2025.
[8] H. Foy, B. Moens, L. Petel, C. Clover, and S. Pfifer, “Europe’s ‘tech sovereignty’ ambitions carry security risks, military warns,” Financial Times, Feb. 24, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.ft.com/content/0f7f7aa7-af4e-4ea6-82da-5f8c719982fe. Accessed: Apr. 27, 2026.
[9] Financial Times, “China expands influence in Africa through investment and diplomacy,” Sep. 6, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.ft.com/content/china-africa-investment-2024. Accessed: Apr. 27, 2026.
[10] B. Belyaev, “5G in the Old World: Why U.S. allies choose Huawei,” TASS, Jan. 30, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://tass.ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/7632815. Accessed: Apr. 27, 2026.
[11] D. Zubarev, “Runet as a political space: The transformation of Russian online media,” Russian Politics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 74–95, 2017.
[12] Gartner, Inc., “Global Government IT Spending,” 2013. https://businesstech.co.za/news/it-services/40420/global-govt-it-spend-seen-flatin2013/#:~:text=Global%20IT%20spending%20by%20government%20organisations%20is%20projected,organisations%20on%20hardware%2C%20software%2C%20IT%20services%20and%20telecommunications.
[13] Gartner, Inc., “Worldwide Government IT Spending Forecast and Trends,” 2023. https://economymiddleeast.com/news/governments-worldwide-to-spend-589-8-bn-on-it/#:~:text=Worldwide%20government%20IT%20spending%20is%20forecast%20to%20total,new%20report%20released%20by%20management%20consulting%20company%20Gartner.
[14] Gartner, Inc., “Worldwide IT Spending Forecast 2026,” 2026. https://marketanalysis.com/gartner-global-it-spending-to-hit-6-31-trillion-in-2026-driven-by-ai-infrastructure/#:~:text=Worldwide%20IT%20spending%20is%20projected%20to%20reach%20%246.31,AI%20infrastructure%2C%20high-performance%20compute%2C%20and%20advanced%20memory%20technologies.
[15] M. E. Roberts, Censored: Distraction and Diversion Inside China’s Great Firewall. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, 2018.
[16] Spanish Ministry of the Interior, “Report on the March 11, 2004 Terrorist Attacks in Madrid,” 2005.
[17] Reuters, “Hundreds injured in Lebanon after Hezbollah pagers explode in coordinated attack,” Sep. 17, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.reuters.com/. Accessed: Apr. 27, 2026.
[18] British Computer Society, “BCS Code of Conduct and Ethical Guidelines,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.bcs.org. Accessed: Apr. 27, 2026.
[19] North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), NATO Strategy on Countering Hybrid Threats, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.nato.int. Accessed: Apr. 27, 2026.
[20] European Centre of Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats, Hybrid Threats and Resilience in Cyberspace, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.hybridcoe.fi. Accessed: Apr. 27, 2026.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Plamen Atanasov, Evelina Atanasova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
