A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO ASSESSING THE SECURITY OF BUILT HERITAGE SITES USING FIRE RISK ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION METHODOLOGY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.68302/std2026.vol1.126Keywords:
fire risk assessment methodology, immovable cultural property, inclusive safety culture, systemic vulnerabilityAbstract
This article presents a comprehensive analysis of fire safety within monastic complexes in Bulgaria — designated as immovable cultural property — utilizing a field-tested risk assessment methodology. The study employs a multidisciplinary research design, integrating longitudinal data from over 500 buildings, with a focused statistical evaluation of 61 representative monastic sites. The methodological framework utilizes eight groups of risk indicators, categorized into unmanageable (variables), manageable (controllable), and neutral conditions. Descriptive and cluster analyses reveal a prevalent “Management-Driven Risk Profile”, where the highest risk levels are concentrated in Technical Installations (Factor IV) and Legal/Organizational Measures (Factor VIII). A Pearson correlation analysis identifies a near-perfect association (r = 0.99) between administrative deficits and technical vulnerability, mathematically proving that fire risk is primarily systemic rather than environmental. To address these findings, the study substantiates a paradigm shift toward an “inclusive safety culture” and the strategic integration of municipal voluntary formations. The results provide an empirical foundation for a transition from reactive firefighting to a proactive, integrated risk management model for cultural heritage preservation.
Supporting Agencies
The author expresses gratitude to the representatives of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church and the local fire services for their cooperation during the field surveys.Downloads
References
[1] G. Mileva, “Obstacles and Opportunities for Raising Cultural Heritage Disaster Prevention Awareness at the National Level in Bulgaria,” Fundamental and Applied Researches in Practice of Leading Scientific Schools, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 18–24, June 2019. [Online]. Available: http://farplss.org. [Accessed November 30, 2019], https://doi.org/10.33531/farplss.2019.3.05.
[2] Y. Stoyanova-Toneva, “Cultural-historical and educational resources of rural areas,” Scientific Papers Series “Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development”, vol. 21, Issue 2, pp. 629-636, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://managementjournal.usamv.ro/pdf/vol.21_2/volume_21_2_2021.pdf. [Accessed May 10, 2026].
[3] UNESCO, Fire Risk Management Guide: Protecting Cultural and Natural Heritage from Fire. Paris, France: UNESCO Publishing, Nov. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/unesco-launches-guide-prevent-fires-cultural-and-natural-heritage-sites
[4] D. Soto, Y. Sánchez Suárez, A. Cabrera Hernández, and A. Hernández Nariño, “Heritage properties management in historic centers: subprocesses and main components,” RSAN, vol. 1, no. 62, pp. 85–92, June 2025. Available: Web of Science, https://www.webofscience.com/. [Accessed March 25, 2026], https://doi.org/10.36097/rsan.v1i62.3489.
[5] E. Garcia-Castillo, I. Paya-Zaforteza, and A. Hospitaler, “Fire in heritage and historic buildings, a major challenge for the 21st century,” Developments in the Built Environment, Vol. 13, 2023, 100102, ISSN 2666-1659. Available: ScienceDirect, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666165922000369. [Accessed May 8, 2026], https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2022.100102.
[6] S. Kincaid, “Fire prevention in historic buildings – approaches for safe practice,” The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice, Vol. 13, Issue 3, pp. 361–380, 2022. [Online]. Available: Taylor&Francis, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17567505.2022.2098633#abstract. [Accessed May 12, 2026], https://doi.org/10.1080/17567505.2022.2098633.
[7] G. Mileva, Izsledvane na sigurnostta na nedvizhimoto kulturno nasledstvo [Research on the Security of Immovable Cultural Heritage]. Varna: Varna Free University "Chernorizets Hrabar", 2012, pp. 104–121, 308–323.
[8] P. Vandevelde et al., Fire Risk Evaluation to European Cultural Heritage: FIRE-TECH Decision Supporting Procedure, Users Guide, 5th FP, Ghent University, Belgium, 2005, p. 19.
[9] G. Mileva, “Otsenkata na riska kato osnoven element ot sistemata za upravlenie na pozharnata zashtita na sgradi – nedvizhimi kulturni tsennosti” [Risk Assessment as a Core Element of the Fire Protection Management System for Buildings – Immovable Cultural Property], in Proc. 6th Sci. Conf. with Int. Participation "Civil Safety 2011", Part II, Academy of the Ministry of Interior, Sofia, 2011, pp. 144–148.
[10] Y. Guan, Z. Fang, and T. Wang, Fire Risk Assessment and Daily Maintenance Management of Cultural Relic Buildings Based on ZigBee Technology, Procedia Engineering, Volume 211, 2018, p. 192-198, ISSN 1877-7058. Available: ScienceDirect, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877705817362276. [Accessed March 20, 2026], https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.12.004.
[11] L. Salazar, E. Paupério, O. Tikhonova, R. Figueiredo, and X. Romão, “A new fire damage index to assess the vulnerability of immovable cultural heritage,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Vol. 111, 2024, 104731, ISSN 2212-4209. Available: ScienceDirect, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221242092400493X. [Accessed May 8, 2026], https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104731.
[12] G. Mileva, Zashtita ot pozhari na nedvizhimite pametnitsi na kulturata [Fire Protection of Immovable Cultural Monuments]. Varna: Varna Free University "Chernorizets Hrabar", 2009, pp. 49–53, 113-114, 151-156, 166-168.
[13] A. Jurecki, W. Grześkowiak and M. Wieruszewski, “Current Standards for the Purposes of Assessing and Classifying Fire Hazards in Historic Buildings,” Fire, vol. 8, no. 11, Art. no. 410, Jan. 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-6255/8/11/410. [Accessed May 14, 2026], https://doi.org/10.3390/fire8110410.
[14] A. Samer and M. Firkova, “Religious tourism of Bulgaria and Syria,” Scientific Works, vol. 64, Issue 2, pp. 163-169, 2022. Available: https://nauchnitrudove.au-plovdiv.bg/17-2-2022/, [Accessed Aug. 8, 2025].
[15] Zakon za zashtita pri bedstviya [Disaster Protection Act]. Promulgated State Gazette (SG) No. 102/19.12.2006, last amended and supplemented SG No. 60/07.07.2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.lex.bg/laws/ldoc/2135540282. [Accessed Apr. 26, 2026].
[16] Naredba za reda za sazdavane i organizirane na deynostta na dobrovolnite formirovaniya za predotvratyavane ili ovladyavane na bedstviya, pozhari i izvunredni situatsii i otstranyavane na posleditsite ot tyah [Ordinance on the procedure for the creation and organization of the activities of voluntary formations for the prevention or management of disasters, fires and emergencies and the elimination of their consequences]. Promulgated State Gazette (SG) No. 50/03.07.2012, last amended SG No. 7/20.01.2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.lex.bg/laws/ldoc/2135800522. [Accessed Apr. 26, 2026].
[17] Project Buzludzha Foundation, “Digital Registers and Maps for Cultural Heritage Protection,” in Proc. Open Forum 'Digitalization and Innovation for Cultural Heritage', Sofia, Bulgaria, Apr. 2026. [Online]. Available: https://buzludzha-project.com/forum/
[18] M. Kyoseva, Civil Law Status of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church (in Bulgarian). Sofia, Bulgaria: Zograf Monastery Heritage Foundation, 2024.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Galina Mileva

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.