COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EFFICIENCY AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE OF A DUAL-FUEL DIESEL ENGINE FUELED WITH COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS AND HYDROGEN

Authors

  • Atanasi Tashev Transport and Aircraft Equipment and Technologies Department, Technical University of Sofia, Branch Plovdiv, Center of Competence “Smart Mechatronic, Eco- and Energy-Saving Systems and Technologies”, Plovdiv, Bulgaria https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4423-9935
  • Evgeni Dimitrov Department of Combustion Engines, Automobile Engineering and Transport, Technical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.68302/std2026.vol3.113

Keywords:

compressed natural gas, dual-fuel engine, hydrogen, thermal efficiency

Abstract

This study presents a comparative experimental analysis of the thermodynamic and economic performance of a compression ignition engine operating in conventional diesel mode and in dual-fuel mode with compressed natural gas and hydrogen. The investigation evaluates the influence of gaseous fuel addition on fuel consumption, brake specific fuel consumption, thermal efficiency, and cost of energy production under identical operating conditions. Experimental tests were conducted on a single-cylinder diesel engine at constant engine speed of 2000 min⁻¹ and variable load, using both fixed (K = 20%) and maximum gas substitution ratios. The performance of the engine was assessed based on measured fuel consumption parameters and calculated efficiency indicators. An economic evaluation was also performed using representative fuel prices. The results show that conventional diesel operation achieves the highest thermal efficiency, reaching approximately 29.5% at medium load, compared to about 28 – 29% for hydrogen and 26 – 27% for compressed natural gas. From an economic perspective, compressed natural gas provides the lowest cost of energy production, reaching values as low as approximately 0.50 €/kWh, followed by diesel at around 0.65 – 0.70 €/kWh, while hydrogen results in the highest cost, exceeding 1.0 €/kWh at low loads due to its higher fuel price. The results highlight a clear trade-off between efficiency and cost. While diesel operation remains the most efficient, and compressed natural gas is the most economically favorable option, hydrogen demonstrates improved performance compared to methane and offers significant environmental benefits.

Supporting Agencies

This research was funded by the European Regional Development Fund within the OP “Research, Innovation and Digitalization Programme for Intelligent Transformation 2021–2027”, Project No. BG16RFPR002-1.014-0005 Center of competence “Smart Mechatronics, Eco- and Energy Saving Systems and Technologies”

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] R. Miletiev, I. Damyanov, E. Iontchev and R. Yordanov, "Smart in-vehicle environment monitoring system," 2020 XXIX International Scientific Conference Electronics (ET), Sozopol, Bulgaria, 2020, pp. 1-4, doi: 10.1109/ET50336.2020.9238166

[2] K. Ambarev, V. Nikolov and A. Ivanov, “System of experimental study of diesel engine at work with Brownian gas,” Mechanics of the Machines, vol. 115, pp. 20–23, 2016.

[3] G. Mladenov, I. Damyanov, D. Saliev and E. Iontchev, “Design of measurement system for vehicle emissions in real road conditions,” in Proceedings of the 30th National Conference with International Participation ‘Telecom 2022’, Sofia, Bulgaria, 2022, pp. 1–4.

[4] G. D. Mladenov, I. Damyanov, D. N. Saliev, T. Valkovski, M. Radev, "Measurement of vehicle emissions in real road conditions part II," Results and analysis. AIP Conf. Proc. 24 January 2024; 2980 (1): 050007. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0186011

[5] A. Dimitrov, “Alternative fuels in ICE—solutions and problems,” Machine Technology and Materials, vol. I-2007, pp. 54–64, 2007.

[6] E. Dimitrov, A. Tashev and S. Pantchev, “Methodology for experimental investigation of the influence of gaseous fuels on the performance of the diesel engine operating on gas-diesel cycle,” in Proceedings of BulTrans-2015, Sozopol, Bulgaria, 2015, pp. 103–107.

[7] V. Nguyen, S. Nayak, H. Le, J. Kowalski, B. Deepanraj, X. Duong, T. Truong, V. Tran, D. Cao and P. Nguyen, “Performance and emission characteristics of diesel engines running on gaseous fuels in dual-fuel mode,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 49, pp. 868–909, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.09.130

[8] M. S. Lounici, K. Loubar, L. Tarabet, M. Bilistrou, D. C. Niculescu and M. Tazerout, “Towards improvement of natural gas-diesel dual fuel mode: An experimental investigation on performance and exhaust emissions,” Energy, vol. 64, pp. 200–211, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.10.049

[9] R. Papagiannakis and T. Hountalas, “Combustion and exhaust emission characteristics of a dual fuel compression ignition engine operated with pilot diesel fuel and natural gas,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 45, pp. 2971–2987, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2004.01.013

[10] G. Belgiorno, G. Di Blasio and C. Beatrice, “Parametric study and optimization of the main engine calibration parameters and compression ratio of a methane-diesel dual fuel engine,” Fuel, vol. 222, pp. 821–840, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.02.038

[11] J. C. Egusquiza, S. L. Braga and S. Braga, “Performance and gaseous emissions characteristics of a natural gas/diesel dual fuel turbocharged and aftercooled engine,” Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, vol. 31, pp. 142–150, 2009.

[12] J. Liu, F. Yang, H. Wang, M. Ouyang and S. Hao, “Effects of pilot fuel quantity on the emissions characteristics of a CNG/diesel dual fuel engine with optimized pilot injection timing,” Applied Energy, vol. 110, pp. 201–206, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.012

[13] K. Debnath, K. Saha and N. Sahoo, “Effect of hydrogen-diesel quantity variation on brake thermal efficiency of a dual fuelled diesel engine,” Journal of Power Technologies, vol. 92, pp. 55–67, 2012.

[14] E. Dimitrov, B. Gigov, S. Pantchev, P. Michaylov and M. Peychev, “A study of hydrogen fuel impact on compression ignition engine performance,” in MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 234, 03001, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201823403001

[15] T. Tsujimura and Y. Suzuki, “The utilization of hydrogen in hydrogen/diesel dual fuel engine,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 43, pp. 14019–14029, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.06.105

[16] Y. Karagöz, İ. Güler, T. Sandalcı, L. Yüksek and A. Dalkılıç, “Effect of hydrogen enrichment on combustion characteristics, emissions and performance of a diesel engine,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 41, pp. 656–665, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.012

[17] E. Dimitrov, A. Tashev, M. Peychev and E. Pavlova, "Methodologies for conducting experimental studies related to the application of gaseous fuels in internal combustion engines," Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 3099 (1), art. no. 012004, 2025, DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/3099/1/012004

Downloads

Published

17.09.2026

How to Cite

[1]
A. Tashev and E. Dimitrov, “COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EFFICIENCY AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE OF A DUAL-FUEL DIESEL ENGINE FUELED WITH COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS AND HYDROGEN”, SysTechDev, vol. 3, pp. 409–415, Sep. 2026, doi: 10.68302/std2026.vol3.113.