ENERGY COST PRESSURE, AGRICULTURAL INPUT PRICES AND FARM ECONOMIC RESILIENCE IN SELECTED MARKET FARM TYPES: COMPARATIVE EVIDENCE FROM BULGARIA AND THE EU-27

Authors

  • Ivan Byanov dept. Economic theory and International economic relations, St. Cyril and St. Methodius University of Veliko Tarnovo, Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7792-4637
  • Nevena Byanova dept. Economic theory and International economic relations, St. Cyril and St. Methodius University of Veliko Tarnovo, Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6460-2540

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.68302/std2026.vol3.107

Keywords:

agriculture, agricultural input costs, Bulgaria, energy prices, farm resilience

Abstract

The paper examines the relationship between energy cost pressure, agricultural input prices and farm economic resilience in Bulgaria compared with the EU-27 average. The empirical design combines three groups of official data sources: Eurostat non-household electricity prices, Eurostat agricultural input price indices, and Farm Sustainability Data Network (FSDN) standard results for selected specialised market farm types. The focus is on Bulgaria and the EU-27 average, with farm-type outcomes compared, energy-price dynamics analysed, and agricultural input-price developments traced for 2020–2024. Methodologically, the study applies a comparative descriptive and relational approach. Farm-type indicators are derived through weighted aggregation across economic size classes.  Four indicators are used to assess resilience: income margin, energy cost share, intermediate consumption intensity and liabilities-to-assets ratio.

The results show that the Bulgarian case cannot be interpreted as a uniform deviation from the EU-27 average. Instead, the evidence points to a strongly differentiated resilience profile across farm types. Milk and other grazing livestock display comparatively strong resilience, granivores improve between 2021 and 2023, while fieldcrops and especially mixed farms weaken markedly by 2023. The findings suggest that the main transmission mechanism operated less through direct energy cost share and more through broader pressures on intermediate consumption and financial sustainability. The paper concludes that agriculture should not be treated as a homogeneous sector when assessing resilience to energy and input price shocks, and that policy responses should be more sensitive to farm-type heterogeneity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] European Commission, “The European Green Deal,” COM(2019) 640 final, 2019. [Online]. Available: EUR-Lex PDF

[2] European Union, “Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality (European Climate Law),” 2021. [Online]. Available: Regulation - 2021/1119 - EN - EUR-Lex

[3] European Commission, “A Farm to Fork Strategy for a fair, healthy and environmentally friendly food system,” COM(2020) 381 final, 2020. [Online]. Available: f2f_action-plan_2020_strategy-info_en.pdf

[4] P. Koundouri, A. Alamanos, A. Plataniotis, C. Stavridis, K. Perifanos, and S. Devves, “Assessing the sustainability of the European Green Deal and its interlinkages with the SDGs,” npj Climate Action, vol. 3, 2024, DOI: 10.1038/s44168-024-00104-6.

[5] International Energy Agency, “Russia’s War on Ukraine,” [Online]. Available: Russia's War on Ukraine – Topics - IEA

[6] International Energy Agency, “Ammonia Technology Roadmap.” Paris, France: IEA, 2021. [Online]. Available: Ammonia Technology Roadmap

[7] FAO, “Fertilizer market developments,” 2025. [Online]. Available: Fertilizer market developments

[8] World Bank, “Commodity Markets Outlook,” Apr. 2025. Washington, DC, USA: World Bank, 2025. DOI: 10.1596/43036.

[9] R. Ryś-Jurek, “On-Farm Production of Renewable Energy in 2014–2022,” Energies, vol. 17, no. 21, art. 5395, 2024, DOI: 10.3390/en17215395.

[10] A. Strzelecka, E. Szafraniec-Siluta, and D. Zawadzka, “Energy Costs and the Financial Situation of Farms in the European Union,” Energies, vol. 18, no. 23, art. 6299, 2025, DOI: 10.3390/en18236299.

[11] L. Wicki, H. Dudek, A. Parzonko, D. Kusz, and K. Naglis-Liepa, “Factors Influencing the Productivity of Direct Energy Inputs in EU Agriculture,” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 3, art. 1217, 2025, DOI: 10.3390/su17031217.

[12] A. Wilczyński and E. Kołoszycz, “Economic Resilience of EU Dairy Farms: An Evaluation of Economic Viability,” Agriculture, vol. 11, no. 6, art. 510, 2021, DOI: 10.3390/agriculture11060510

[13] J. Martín-García, J. A. Gómez-Limón, and A. Menor-Campos, “Farms’ economic resilience: assessment, drivers and policy-making,” Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, vol. 27, art. 100740, 2025, DOI: 10.1016/j.indic.2025.100740

[14] Y. Toneva, “Production and Consumption of Organic Food in the Republic of Bulgaria - Problems and Prospects,” in Environment. Technology. Resources. Proceedings of the 16th International Scientific and Practical Conference, vol. 1, pp. 537–545, 2025, DOI: 10.17770/etr2025vol1.8674.

[15] Eurostat, “Price indices of the means of agricultural production, input (2020 = 100) - annual data,” online data code: APRI_PI20_INA. DOI: 10.2908/apri_pi20_ina.

[16] Eurostat, “Electricity prices for non-household consumers - bi-annual data (from 2007 onwards),” online data code: NRG_PC_205. DOI: 10.2908/nrg_pc_205.

[17] European Commission, “FSDN public database / Farm economy focus,” Agri-food Data Portal, Brussels, 2025. Available: European Commission | Agri-food data portal | FSDN Database

[18] Eurostat, “Price indices of the means of agricultural production, input (2020 = 100) — annual data,” dataset apri_pi20_ina, European Commission, Luxembourg, 2025. DOI: 10.2908/APRI_PI20_INA

Downloads

Published

17.09.2026

How to Cite

[1]
I. Byanov and N. Byanova, “ENERGY COST PRESSURE, AGRICULTURAL INPUT PRICES AND FARM ECONOMIC RESILIENCE IN SELECTED MARKET FARM TYPES: COMPARATIVE EVIDENCE FROM BULGARIA AND THE EU-27”, SysTechDev, vol. 3, pp. 357–362, Sep. 2026, doi: 10.68302/std2026.vol3.107.